A century of generalization

We review data from both ethology and psychology about generalization, that is how animals respond to sets of stimuli including familiar and novel stimuli. Our main conclusion is that patterns of generalization are largely independent of systematic group (evidence is available for insects, fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals, including humans), behavioural context (feeding, drinking, courting, etc.), sensory modality (light, sound, etc.) and of whether reaction to stimuli is learned or genetically inherited. These universalities suggest that generalization originates from general properties of nervous systems, and that evolutionary strategies to cope with novelty and variability in stimulation may be limited. Two major shapes of the generalization gradient can be identified, corresponding to two types of stimulus dimensions. When changes in stimulation involve a rearrangement of a constant amount of stimulation on the sense organs, the generalization gradient peaks close to familiar stimuli, and peak responding is not much higher than responding to familiar stimuli. Contrary to what is often claimed, such gradients are better described by Gaussian curves than by exponentials. When the stimulus dimension involves a variation in the intensity of stimulation, the gradient is often monotonic, and responding to some novel stimuli is considerably stronger than responding to familiar stimuli. Lastly, when several or many familiar stimuli are close to each other predictable biases in responding occur, along all studied dimensions. We do not find differences between biases referred to as peak shift and biases referred to as supernormal stimulation. We conclude by discussing theoretical issues.